Simon F wrote:
Mark wrote:
Would have been a lot better if they didn't have him down as a Sunday player and played on Friday as the £50 what he won today, there would have been 3 0's added to that, though he probably would have blown his chances of winning it.
Hard to tell what his gambling preferences were based on that game though.
Let's do some more speculation then, shall we?
Again, we'll assume that he and his son chose the boxes in (almost) the same way as they did today.
Round 11 -
£1002 -
50p5 -
£119 -
£50015 -
£5,000Well, that would have been a much better opening round...
Round 214 -
£1,00012 -
£508 -
£10,000Oh, wow - he would have been in a great situation here...
Round 311 -
£7509 -
£25021 -
£10Wow, WOW,
WOW...
Board:
1p 10p £5 £3,000 £15,000 £20,000 £35,000 £50,000 £75,000 £100,000 £250,000I reckon, though, that the Banker would have ensured that Claudio went on by using the excuse "I've got three of my Power 5 still there"... get my drift?
Round 413 -
£15,00010 -
£20,0007 -
£75,000The Banker would have probably claimed that was his round, and would have gone down...
But any 8-box board with four of the player's Power 5 is great - even with the 1p, and two other Banker's P5 amounts, there as well.
So unless he really needed the money, I reckon Claudio might have gone on...
Round 516 -
£56 would have been in front of him, so...
4 -
£35,0003 -
£100,000Oooooooh...
Board:
1p 10p £3,000 £50,000 £250,000I would expect an offer of around £15k here - the Banker no doubt using the excuse that the two lowest amounts are still there...
And while it is indeed hard to tell what Claudio's gambling preferences were, I reckon he might have
dealt.
Round 6 22 -
£250,000 18 -
1p 17 or 20? Let's say 17.
17 -
£3,000So
10p vs
£50,000...
Had he still been in live play, a stick at around £15k or a slight decrease would have seemed likely... and, again, I reckon he might have dealt.
So he probably would have missed out on the £50k - but it's also almost certain that he would have won a lot more than he actually did.