Boiler bunny? Superman? Welcome to Deal or No Deal!
And she has a target. Guessing she'll be quite cautious then. Thread's only two pages at 9:25pm so definitely not a massive win.
Unlucky numbers first, and one big hit first box followed by an orange and two blues. Unsure what to do with the lucky number, so perhaps a swap offer first - nope, we get one of Wakey Winter generosity.
The Rock is not what we wanted to see. 10p, though, is. matt26 is thinking the same as me... crumbs, £75,000 goes, and that's going to mean £NO_DEAL at the second offer, meaning the first serves only as a means of incentivising chase-the-money play on a modest board... oh, OK, Tracey's going to big-up the jackpot and in return he's going to stick. And with a good third round we could be in for a genuinely dealable third offer, and if she's a targetist it's probably twenty grand, and we might be in for the guilt trip... Banker says the player's savvy enough to not chase the jackpot, but a £40k target is basically a sign of reckless gambling on almost any board. Not many people get offered £40k at any point in their game - maybe two a month at most?
Anyway, £16,500 was a recurring motif from a while back, and before I can start wondering if Love Never Dies will reuse any recurring motifs from Phantom of the Opera, we play on and get to a... rather early break, 4:35pm, with the top two and £35k intact... and now a blue goes! Talk of a lucky number... £22,500 is slightly more than Donna's eight-box on a slightly better board and both that and this are marginal No Deals for m... oh, OK, instantly gambling, she really is playing for the big money.
kestral wrote:
Tracey says sorry to her partner for saying no deal so quickly, but she was worried he would talk her into dealing.
Is this early 2007 all over again? Donna's game was December 2006 of course...
£100k goes. Ouch. But then an orange... and a blue! £35k still backing up the jackpot, and out comes the best-known recurring motif of all.
kestral wrote:
Tracey says the offer is making this difficult as if it was £17,000 she would have played on right away, but if it was £75,000 she would have dealt
The mean is £58,000, so, erm, yes. I'd take this in the absence of a Banker guarantee, but there's definitely room for a No Deal... she brings on the hubby, hinting at a Deal, but we don't get one! Never mind the risk-taking ability, she's got a knack for theatre...
Orange goes first... unsure about 2 again, leaves it alone... blast. Now we're going to use it, and if this is £35,000 it's one of the biggest crashes of all time... it's the penny! No nonsense, no messing, producer goads future players on by making a ridiculously high two-box bailout on an all-or-peanuts finish, which... erm, she turns down.
She actually turned down an offer that screamed 'Deal me, and demonstrate that gamblers can't actually win blues, thus making more people gamble'.
Corinne aside, I can't remember the last gamble so far removed from my personal utility curve, or indeed what I would expect typical viewers to do.
kestral wrote:
Tracey can't watch the box being opened
That, folks, is a pretty good indicator that she made this decision at haste, with the potential to regret at leisure. Remember Tony's similar gamble at slightly higher stakes from a similar position with bonus offers? As DanJudge pointed out at the time, that game triggered a run of (successful) caution that lasted for weeks, and which he iconified with his 11-box OPW. This flip of the lid could shape the whole of February.
And one flash of red sends the whole place crazy.
The burden of responsibility for ensuring this does not become another Wakey Winter now falls to two people. Noel is one, of course, and I thoroughly expect him to derogate from that responsibility; the other is Statgirl Linda. It is peculiarly coincidental that the last Statgirl I can remember was Georgina, from the original Wakey Winter; she got ruthlessly edited out for talking sense, and made a questionable No Deal herself. Linda's already got more in the edit than Georgina did all through the wing run, and is presumably pencilled in for a twist game...
matt26 wrote:
The thing is, if Tracey had won 50p she'd simply be remembered as another idiot that deserved to crash, up there with the likes of John G, Fin and Player 14. But since she was lucky enough to do well, instead she's considered 'brave' rather than foolish.
And some of us are morally consistent enough to put the same label on the ones that luck out and the ones that don't. Foolhardy.