alexandercbrown wrote:
To add to the comments again I'm getting worried about this show again - people just 'see' moderate/lowish offers and don't analyse the board , not making more of an attempt to go for the huge money.
That's the trouble when we've had 2 games this week where the player has gone on in a 1-box game and it hasn't paid off - it returns the show to the caution cycle again. It's been a pretty strange week all round, really (not least because I saw 2 of the shows 3 months ago!).
I quite liked Jimbo, and the game was looking very strong at one point with the entire power 5 and 7 of the top 8 values remaining at the halfway stage. Then he had a quickie, which was pretty disastrous, and he seemed to lose his nerve. He seemed to be dwelling on the boxes that had just gone, rather than reflecting on the potential of the board he had, which with a £500 minimum prize and 4 reds, was surely value enough to go on.
Again, it depends on what you're there for - a modest but decent sum or a once-in-a-lifetime chance at the mega money. Jimbo just wanted a decent sum, and that's
a way of playing the game. Not the way I would play it, but a legitmate strategy nonetheless. I would like to see more analysts on the show, though (where have they all gone? the last proper one was probably Ed, and even he got the odds wrong at the end!)
It's just a shame that lately, the ones that have been courageous enough to go for the big money have had trainwrecks finishes and the ones who exercise caution miss out on the mega money, leaving an uncertainty of what to do for the best, and the banker as chief manipulator.