For me I'd say Suzanne's game. It was the only one where I didn't know the direct result. Plus it was a near-perfect game.

Second would be Alice, then Laura.

I preferred Laura's win over Alice's, and still do - but Suzanne's beats them by quite a margin...

In terms of people: Alice 1st, Suzanne 2nd, Laura 3rd... I think.

In terms of the game: Suzanne 1st, Laura 2nd, Alice 3rd.

Alice was offered a very easy banker's gamble, and Laura had a relatively poor offer at 2-box, whereas Suzanne won it through turning down a good offer and swappnig! Although I suppose she did have a good fallback. The only thing that would trump Suzanne's game would be someone winning it on a blue vs £250k board, after turning down a good offer... and swapping.

Gotta be Suzanne since it was the only one I didn't have the slighest clue about!!!

Suzanne's came about in an organic manner - through an astonishing board. Alice's win was as organic as GM Turkey Twizzlers, and to a lesser extent so was Laura's (at the end, anyway; to be honest, I think that her five-box gamble was genuinely questionable in her circumstance, but once she made it there was no choice but to go to the end).

So probably Suzanne's.

Definitely Suzanne. The game and the player. It was just all majestic.

Has to be Suzanne's. Apart from a 5-box and sequence of box openings in a non-twist week, I don't think you will get a more perfect £250k winner.