Sarah 27/05

**Posted:** Sun May 27, 2007 8:22 pm **Author:** basicasic **Post subject:**

h2005 wrote:

They may own a factory and have quite a lot of money from that, but I don't really see why that would automatically mean they would give money to Sarah.

Well in my experience, mates with loaded parents always had better cars, better hi-fis, better clothes, more money to spend going out despite 'having no money' like me.

Which may give a possible reason for her early deal. If she's had plenty all her life perhaps she had no real hunger to chase the big money like I would have had at that age.

**Posted:** Sun May 27, 2007 8:23 pm **Author:** Tom **Post subject:**

Well done Sarah! She dealt when she felt neccessary.

**Joined:** Wed Jan 17, 2007 1:23 am **Warnings:** 0

she was irritating it has to be said so it was kinda fun seeing her pay
for her cowardice.
someone clarify to me here did her dad tell her to deal?

**Joined:** Thu Feb 23, 2006 10:36 pm **Warnings:** 0

SrWilson wrote:

she was irritating it has to be said so it was kinda fun seeing her pay
for her cowardice.
someone clarify to me here did her dad tell her to deal?

All I heard him say was "I would"...I took that to mean he would go on, but I guess he could have been saying he would deal.

**Posted:** Sun May 27, 2007 9:45 pm **Author:** Duffer **Post subject:**

basicasic wrote:

Which may give a possible reason for her early deal. If she's had plenty all her life perhaps she had no real hunger to chase the big money like I would have had at that age.

I think she made it pretty clear she had no money. You're making it sound like she was the heiress to the Walls or Cornetto empire...

Undeniably though, she was a cautious player but, as others have said, it's this grand mix which makes the show all the more fascinating. As my old A-Level English teacher used to say 'Try to think in colours, not in black and white'. Admittedly, that wasn't much use when you're sat in an exam struggling with Chaucer...

Anyway, I really liked Sarah and hope she puts the £7500 to good use.

**Joined:** Tue Jul 11, 2006 12:01 am **Warnings:** 0

Not sure if I was hearing things, but I'm sure Noel called the day "Saturday" and referred to "yesterdays" game.

I'm guessing that means they were planning to move it back to Saturday for some reason, that didn't happen, and then they forgot to edit it?

**Posted:** Sun May 27, 2007 10:10 pm **Author:** Gaz99er **Post subject:**

What is about Ice Cream workers and Hundreds and Thousands - Banker Beware! :lol:

**Joined:** Tue Jan 30, 2007 11:58 pm **Warnings:** 0

Well done Sarah, enjoy the money :-D

**Joined:** Tue Jan 03, 2006 6:02 pm **Warnings:** 0

TicTac wrote:

Not sure if I was hearing things, but I'm sure Noel called the day "Saturday" and referred to "yesterdays" game.

I'm guessing that means they were planning to move it back to Saturday for some reason, that didn't happen, and then they forgot to edit it?

Yes, Zeddie picked up on this earlier as well in the thread.

It was either a slip of the tongue by Noel, or as you say, they had planned a schedule change and never went ahead with it.

**Posted:** Mon May 28, 2007 9:11 am **Author:** £250,000 fan **Post subject:**

This was a good game but she did lose out by £92,500. Well done Sarah for winning £7,500 and enjoy the money :!:

**Posted:** Mon May 28, 2007 9:53 am **Author:** basicasic **Post subject:**

kestral wrote:

TicTac wrote:

Not sure if I was hearing things, but I'm sure Noel called the day "Saturday" and referred to "yesterdays" game.

I'm guessing that means they were planning to move it back to Saturday for some reason, that didn't happen, and then they forgot to edit it?

Yes, Zeddie picked up on this earlier as well in the thread.

It was either a slip of the tongue by Noel, or as you say, they had planned a schedule change and never went ahead with it.

At the intro Noel says 'I hope your weekend is going fantastically and I hope Sunday is now going to be very special for the fans of Deal or No Deal'.

So the game was definitely scheduled for Sunday.

But he did say 'yesterday's game' later on so it must have been a slip of the tongue that got past editing.

**Posted:** Mon May 28, 2007 12:34 pm **Author:** beaker **Post subject:**

daniel4389 wrote:

Aww I LOVED Sarah. However cowardly you think she was, she was one of the sweetest loveliest contestants ever. She was so happy and smiley and just seemed to treat the whole thing as a laugh. She's definitely in my top three Sarahs...

For what it's worth, I could understand her deal...it was a horrible board really, taking £7.5k and having £250k would be painful but then it could quite easily have become a £10k (or even a £1k!!) board by the fourth offer and that would arguably have been worse. She still seemed happy with what she had at the end and would probably only have got £10k more at the very most so I don't think it was too disastrous.

It could never have become a £1k or £10k board as she had £100k in her box. I felt she made a mistake and went too early.......

£7.5k is easily money you could earn fairly quickly, £100k unless you are in a well paid job will take you years to get to that level after tax.

She made a major error and she will live to regret it I fear.

**Joined:** Thu Feb 23, 2006 10:36 pm **Warnings:** 0

beaker wrote:

It could never have become a £1k or £10k board as she had £100k in her box.

Yes, because she obviously knew that at the time of the deal...

**Joined:** Fri Feb 24, 2006 10:04 pm **Warnings:** 0

daniel4389 wrote:

beaker wrote:

It could never have become a £1k or £10k board as she had £100k in her box.

Yes, because she obviously knew that at the time of the deal...

If only it had been Psychic Sarah instead...

**Joined:** Sat Mar 11, 2006 1:24 am **Warnings:** 0

beaker wrote:

daniel4389 wrote:

Aww I LOVED Sarah. However cowardly you think she was, she was one of the sweetest loveliest contestants ever. She was so happy and smiley and just seemed to treat the whole thing as a laugh. She's definitely in my top three Sarahs...

For what it's worth, I could understand her deal...it was a horrible board really, taking £7.5k and having £250k would be painful but then it could quite easily have become a £10k (or even a £1k!!) board by the fourth offer and that would arguably have been worse. She still seemed happy with what she had at the end and would probably only have got £10k more at the very most so I don't think it was too disastrous.

It could never have become a £1k or £10k board as she had £100k in her box. I felt she made a mistake and went too early.......

Well that's all very well saying that afterwards, but at the time, Sarah didn't know she had the £100,000 in her box or otherwise she would have no dealt, obviously. Daniel was just weighing up the possible outcomes that could have happened if she no dealt and a £1,000 vs £10,000 board could have been one at that time, obviously it wasn't though because she had the £100,000 but you don't know that at the time!

"The Banker" wrote:

beaker wrote:

daniel4389 wrote:

Aww I LOVED Sarah. However cowardly you think she was, she was one of the sweetest loveliest contestants ever. She was so happy and smiley and just seemed to treat the whole thing as a laugh. She's definitely in my top three Sarahs...

For what it's worth, I could understand her deal...it was a horrible board really, taking £7.5k and having £250k would be painful but then it could quite easily have become a £10k (or even a £1k!!) board by the fourth offer and that would arguably have been worse. She still seemed happy with what she had at the end and would probably only have got £10k more at the very most so I don't think it was too disastrous.

It could never have become a £1k or £10k board as she had £100k in her box. I felt she made a mistake and went too early.......

Well that's all very well saying that afterwards, but at the time, Sarah didn't know she had the £100,000 in her box or otherwise she would have no dealt, obviously. Daniel was just weighing up the possible outcomes that could have happened if she no dealt and a £1,000 vs £10,000 board could have been one at that time, obviously it wasn't though because she had the £100,000 but you don't know that at the time!

ITA I thought the deal was bad at the time but the £250,000 went in the proveout and most people wouldn't have gambled £7,500 on a 4 blues vs £100,000 board anyway. I would have dealt aty 5 box but could've no dealt the last offer.

**Posted:** Tue May 29, 2007 1:31 am **Author:** h2005 **Post subject:**

Sarah's deal was quite surprising but I can quite see why she dealt... that board could've easily fallen apart and she'd have struggled to see an offer as high as £7,500 again if it had, so if the money meant that much to her (which it clearly did), then I see no problem in her dealing when she did!

Well done to her and I hope she puts the money to good use and / or enjoys it!

**Joined:** Sat Jan 28, 2006 8:00 pm **Warnings:** 0

Sarah made her decision. And I'm sure she's regretting it.

As well she might.

**Posted:** Tue May 29, 2007 12:06 pm **Author:** James1978 **Post subject:**

Sarah might be in the running for my fave W2'er. She was that great. And I loved the way she didn't seem the slightest bit bothered about having the £100k, everyone knew it was going to take someone like Buddy or Khanny to have got to the £100k! (For what it's worth, I'd have won precisely a quid more than Sarah)! ;-)

I wish someone would give me £7,500!

**Joined:** Thu Feb 23, 2006 10:36 pm **Warnings:** 0

James1978 wrote:

Sarah might be in the running for my fave W2'er. She was that great.

Hurrah! She's not as good as Pat G or Leila IMO but I think she just about beats Roy.

Main DOND Site	Play DOND Games	DOND TV Guide	DOND Stats		FAQs	Hall of Fame
Ebay Watch	DOND Merchandise	Be a Contestant	DOND Amazon Store	DOND Blog	Privacy Policy	Contact Us

Sarah 27/05

Who is online