denzelh wrote:
- Graeme was clearly dressed for his game and knew he would be playing.
He was probably allowed to get changed after he was picked and they refilmed the start
denzelh wrote:
- Unluckily for him he took out most of the big reds early on which made his 'no deal' decision at £21,000 surprising particularly as he had just said he would deal at £21,000.
I was quite surprised he no-dealt straight after he said he would deal at £21K. But that's minor b*lls*it compared to most players.
denzelh wrote:
- Seriously, with that board would anyone out there have said 'no deal' at £41,000 - unless you knew for sure where the £250,000 was.
You haven't read the dealometer thread then.
denzelh wrote:
- He was also unlucky that the newbie had the £250,000 box which meant he had to leave him until the very end to open his first box. Has anyone left a newbie to the very end on their first show?
Plenty of times I would suspect.
denzelh wrote:
Personally I didn't buy his surprise at being chosen to play, the story about how unlucky he is or the 'tears' at the end. I think he used his knowledge of where the £250,000 was to control the game and engineer a large offer rather than take the big prize which would have really raised suspicions.
Of course I may be talking utter rubbish (it wouldn't be the first time!) but something didn't feel right to me about the way that game panned out.
Anybody agree/disagree?
You've been watching too much X-Files mate
