Di 28/03

**Posted:** Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:57 pm **Author:** h2005 **Post subject:**

never_wrong wrote:

Has John G had some major plastic surgery in order to appear on the show again?

Madness!

Haha!!

Noel talking about the £8,000 saying it's bigger "than a fiver or a tenner or whatever" - why didn't he say that when Steven dealt too EARLY and won £27,500?

**Posted:** Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:58 pm **Author:** Lewis246 **Post subject:**

Maltus wrote:

Hopefully this game will shut him up about contestants having not having regrets.

He'll probably just go on about the fact that she could have had £20,000.

**Joined:** Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:36 pm **Warnings:** 0

Maltus wrote:

Noel has a lot to answer for. Hopefully this game will shut him up about contestants having not having regrets.

what on earth its noels thought she is greedy lmao, dnt think so.

**Posted:** Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:58 pm **Author:** Maltus **Post subject:**

I have to say that game has annoyed me slightly. £44,000 was an inflated offer as it was and with that board, no-one in their right mind should turn it down. Gobsmacked.

**Joined:** Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:19 pm **Warnings:** 0

OMG Di!! What a game!!

**Posted:** Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:59 pm **Author:** h2005 **Post subject:**

Maltus wrote:

h2005 wrote:

:shock:

I can't remember such a brave / stupid no deal and such a tense moment as the £250k box was opened!

I was expecting her to no deal that £8,000 offer!!!

:shock:

It wasn't brave, as far as I'm concerned. But its her money.

I was trying to be neutral there.

Maybe I should've highlighted "stupid" in bold - because yes, no dealing £44,000 on that board was plain stupid!!! :shock:

**Posted:** Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:00 pm **Author:** Rhyd **Post subject:**

I nearly Died watching this game!! :lol:

**Posted:** Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:00 pm **Author:** greeny **Post subject:**

That was plain stupidity by Di to turn down £44,000, and I knew she should have stayed away from 22, as I was convinced the big money was there, but a shame she didn't then go all the way to find £20,000 in her box 11.

**Joined:** Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:33 pm **Warnings:** 0

johnr wrote:

So she didn't come there for £44,000 but she dealt at £8,000?!

Mad ...

1 She really had/has no idea about even the most basic game playing
and
2 She can afford to turn down £44,000. (That sum would change most people's lives, mine included!)

**Posted:** Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:01 pm **Author:** jmas07 **Post subject:**

Maltus wrote:

I have to say that game has annoyed me slightly. £44,000 was an inflated offer as it was and with that board, no-one in their right mind should turn it down. Gobsmacked.

She might have had a higher target than £44,000. And also, she might have thought she would have gotten another offer that high, at that same ratio.

**Joined:** Sun Mar 25, 2007 7:57 pm **Warnings:** 0

Very odd decision - a 44k offer on a board a fair bit weaker than Kelsie's on Monday.

Can't believe she didn't take it - high chance of hitting the quarter mill and ending up with a much lower offer.

**Posted:** Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:04 pm **Author:** h2005 **Post subject:**

I'm sorry, but I have to say there is a line between bravery, stupidity and greed. I think Di's no dealing of the £44,000 crossed the line into "greed" territory - especially after she saw what happened last week, where several players went away with peanuts when they could've safely dealt at higher offers.

Either she really was mad, or she had been influenced by Noel's in recent games, whereby he has (more or less) implied that dealing is the wrong attitude to take...

**Joined:** Mon Mar 06, 2006 5:59 pm **Warnings:** 0

haha loved kerry today!

**Posted:** Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:06 pm **Author:** jmas07 **Post subject:**

h2005 wrote:

I'm sorry, but I have to say there is a line between bravery, stupidity and greed. I think Di's no dealing of the £44,000 crossed the line into "greed" territory - especially after she saw what happened last week, where several players went away with peanuts when they could've safely dealt at higher offers.

Either she really was mad, or she had been influenced by Noel's in recent games, whereby he has (more or less) implied that dealing is the wrong attitude to take...

She also had to consider the other games that went wrong, because the person dealt.

**Posted:** Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:06 pm **Author:** daniel123 **Post subject:**

WOW. I SIMPLY CAN NOT EXPRESS HOW MUCH I HATE ALL PEOPLE WHO TURN DOWN £44K AND THEN GO ON TO TAKE £8,000.

IS SHE MAD??

AND THE BANKER. WHY IN ALL THATS *beep*HOLY DID HE HAVE TO OFFER £30K??? AND THEN £44K????? IF I SEE GLENN HUGILL I WILL KILL HIM. :-D

**Joined:** Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:36 pm **Warnings:** 0

people its a bloody tv show why get so worked up.

**Posted:** Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:08 pm **Author:** jmas07 **Post subject:**

daniel123 wrote:

WOW. I SIMPLY CAN NOT EXPRESS HOW MUCH I HATE ALL PEOPLE WHO TURN DOWN £44K AND THEN GO ON TO TAKE £8,000.

IS SHE MAD??

AND THE BANKER. WHY IN ALL THATS *beep*HOLY DID HE HAVE TO OFFER £30K??? AND THEN £44K????? IF I SEE GLENN HUGILL I WILL KILL HIM. :-D

Well, I thought she was sensible. If people called Kelsie sensible for dealing an offer half of what it should have been, I am going to call Di sensible for declining an offer double of what it should have been. I am perfectly entitled to do so, and Kelsie lost more money out of it!

**Joined:** Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:19 pm **Warnings:** 0

seanmacleod wrote:

people its a bloody tv show why get so worked up.

maybe its a DoND forum? :roll:

**Posted:** Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:09 pm **Author:** h2005 **Post subject:**

jmas07 wrote:

h2005 wrote:

I'm sorry, but I have to say there is a line between bravery, stupidity and greed. I think Di's no dealing of the £44,000 crossed the line into "greed" territory - especially after she saw what happened last week, where several players went away with peanuts when they could've safely dealt at higher offers.

Either she really was mad, or she had been influenced by Noel's in recent games, whereby he has (more or less) implied that dealing is the wrong attitude to take...

She also had to consider the other games that went wrong, because the person dealt.

I think in the last week, there were more games where the player could've got more by dealing earlier in the game, than by going to the end.

**Posted:** Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:10 pm **Author:** jmas07 **Post subject:**

h2005 wrote:

jmas07 wrote:

h2005 wrote:

I'm sorry, but I have to say there is a line between bravery, stupidity and greed. I think Di's no dealing of the £44,000 crossed the line into "greed" territory - especially after she saw what happened last week, where several players went away with peanuts when they could've safely dealt at higher offers.

Either she really was mad, or she had been influenced by Noel's in recent games, whereby he has (more or less) implied that dealing is the wrong attitude to take...

She also had to consider the other games that went wrong, because the person dealt.

I think in the last week, there were more games where the player could've got more by dealing earlier in the game, than by going to the end.

Well, I think Kelsie's game swung her the most. Maybe even Patrick's!

Main DOND Site	Play DOND Games	DOND TV Guide	DOND Stats		FAQs	Hall of Fame
Ebay Watch	DOND Merchandise	Be a Contestant	DOND Amazon Store	DOND Blog	Privacy Policy	Contact Us

Di 28/03

Who is online