An interesting game. G certainly talked the talk but whether he walked the walk was debatable. Certainly i think the Banker's 3rd round offer was cleverly pitched (anything between the £15-20K was well worth considering) but i had a feeling there was at least one more round in it.
If i understand correctly the Poker chip he gave to the Banker told the Banker he was bluffing, was that his intention? Seems strange, and i'm not sure what message he was trying to get accross. Surely the person he should try to bluff is the Banker, letting him in on the plan doesn't make sense to me.
And with regards to the validity of dealing at the third offer can i just add to the debate by pointing out that there are many players who no dealed the third offer and missed out on a spanking because of it. There's no right or wrong time to leave the game as such, you just have to go when you feel the moment is right and hope that it is justified in proveout (or in the box opening if that is the case)