I was thinking what would gambles would of been reckless if they didn't DEAL. I was thinking Rodney because he turned down some generous offers in his game and if he rejected 85,000, I am sure that would of been reckless.

Graeme is another one he had some good offers in the game, I was thinking he was reckless if he didn't accept £101,000. He turned down 41k and 21k previously.

Both of these guys had also the lower amount in their box.

So who do you think?

I couldn't put a L at the end of the topic title.


I used the maximum amount of characters for a title.

Kerry-A.... Oh, Wait.

£50k Doreen and £17k Lucia (December 2012) definitely fall into that category, as declining 80%+ of the average on a one box game is unquestionably reckless.

On a similar wavelength, £54k Mally and £47k Trevor from November 2005 would've been very reckless had they declined their 5 box offers, but they didn't even have the slightest desire to do so (unlike Player 14 ).

Can't believe you left out £120k Jennifer when talking about November '05 in this thread

£88k Alex. Same finish as Corinne except she had DEALT!

Oops.

£35k Maurice's 5 box decision doesn't quite qualify, though, as going by the offer patterns of the time he had a 10% chance of £160,000 vs. a 30% chance of £105,000 vs. a 30% chance of £30,000 vs. a 30% of next to nothing. I'd be VERY tempted to take that on, but the 30% chance of crashing from a Power 5 amount to a blue would probably sway me to Deal.

However, I'd say that £50k Lee and £45k Daz from the next few months also qualify.