Time to use the "multi-vote" option, by doing a few of these.

<--->

1p and £75,000

And you have £18,500 from the last round where you also had £15,000 and £1,000. Would you DEAL (select DEAL 1) or NO DEAL (select NO DEAL 1) the Banker's Gamble?

<--->

£35,000 and £250,000

You accepted £103,000 as an above mean offer with all the power 5 at 5-box. Would you DEAL (select DEAL 2) or NO DEAL (select NO DEAL 2) the Banker's Gamble

<--->

£20,000 and £35,000

Having dealt £28,000 in the previous round with £100,000 there too. Would you DEAL (select DEAL 3) or NO DEAL (select NO DEAL 3) the Banker's Gamble?

<--->

And since we haven't seen a situation as such...

10p
£250
£1,000
£10,000
£250,000

You accepted £19,000 as an offer with three more blues on the board. Would you DEAL (select DEAL 4) or NO DEAL (select NO DEAL 4) the Banker's Gamble?

Last one wouldn't happen - it'd have been a four-figure eight-box offer, and if it was £19k at eight-box it'd have been £40k at five!

Banker's Gambles are just undoing the prior Deal and then offering the same amount again so I'd treat them as ordinary offers: £18,500 on 1p/£75k is a Deal, £103k (LOL at how you got to it) on £35k/£250k is a very, very reluctant Deal, and every AMO is a Deal. So I wouldn't take any of those gambles.

That said, knock off just 10% off all of those offers, and I'm gambling. Certainly on the last two, and maybe on the first (10% off £18,500 is £16,650, and that's marginal on 1p/£75k).

No Deal them all (assuming No Deal means keeping the money and not taking the gamble) except possibly 2.

Possibly deal the first two, definite no deal on the other two.

No Deal them all (i.e. keeping the money).

Why have you got "do not vote" options in the poll? People have voted for them already, so I see...

I was about to ask why on earth he'd offer the gamble straight after an all-blue round before realising he did just that in Ann's game.

I know, I just wanted some sort of divider to make them clearer. This obviously isn't the answer

Yes... might have been better to do it without the "dividers".

I put

No Deal

Deal

Deal

No Deal

1. No Deal
2. Deal
3. No Deal
4. No Deal

Im actually quite surprised people would not accept the bankers gamble when the two amounts left are £20,000 and £35,000, i thought that would be the one people would "Deal" on!

Craig... one reason. People here can add up!

ok ok, i was just thinking it would be worth at least going for it with the back-up of the £20k. Dont have to get all simple on me i was just wondering!

I think your average Joe Bloggs would probably accept the gamble on option 3, as they would have Craig's thinking that £20k is a good backup. Having said that, I can see why the people who focus on the stats side would be aghast at anyone dealing the gamble there. I'd no deal it myself because it's an AMO, but can understand why people might accept it.

1. ND
2. Deal
3. Deal - I don't care it's an AMO, a guaranteed 20k would make me take the gamble
4. ND

It still confuses me a bit as to what "deal" and "no deal" actually means in those scenarios.

I would keep the money in all of them except number 2. The last one seems really far-fetched but there's still a huge chance of it going pear-shaped after a good round. I can't see it ever being offered not at 2-box anyway, as you could undeal once then deal again at 2-box.

no deal the banker's gamble on 1p and £75,000

Deal the banker's gamble with £35K and 250K as 35K is a great backup and 103K is well less than the mean.

No deal the 3rd one as 28K is AMO

No deal the last one.

1. undecided/marginal

2. deal

3. probably deal

4. deal I think.

I thought that was strange as well surely 50/75K would have replaced one of the blues.