First Chippendeals promo photo EXCLUSIVE

**Joined:** Tue Jan 03, 2006 6:02 pm **Warnings:** 0

DOND Exclusive

Part of the Chippendeals lineup promo photo :-D

**Joined:** Sat Mar 18, 2006 3:24 pm **Warnings:** 0

Brilliant...

Good work Kestral

Caz x

**Posted:** Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:32 am **Author:** Qwerty **Post subject:**

Nice one kestral :-D

Lookin good Aaron!

:lol::-D

Wonder if there will be more...?

:lol:

**Posted:** Wed Mar 22, 2006 12:08 pm **Author:** Gazza **Post subject:**

Ha ha!!

Absolutely superb!!!

Not far off either!!! :-D

**Posted:** Wed Mar 22, 2006 12:10 pm **Author:** Qwerty **Post subject:**

Lol, you sure Gazza?

:lol:

**Posted:** Wed Mar 22, 2006 12:14 pm **Author:** Gazza **Post subject:**

Well... Maybe a little exageration!
:roll:

**Posted:** Wed Mar 22, 2006 12:22 pm **Author:** Qwerty **Post subject:**

a little?!....

:lol:

I find picture that morally offensive and wrong.

Why didnt you think of all the young kids that go on here? Imagine what they're going to think when they see it?

And I'm sure that you might have offended the people concerned.

And by the way, I'm not being at all funny or trying to be awkward.

**Posted:** Wed Mar 22, 2006 12:32 pm **Author:** Qwerty **Post subject:**

Jeremy Kyle's Dad wrote:

I find picture that morally offensive and wrong.

Why didnt you think of all the young kids that go on here? Imagine what they're going to think when they see it?

And I'm sure that you might have offended the people concerned.

I don't think the picture is meant to be offensive. Deal or No Deal is also a programme for older viewers so I doubt many young children will come across it. Gary and Aaron have both made comments about the picture, so it doesn't seem that they are offended by it. It is just a bit of fun that's not meant to have caused any harm.

Regards

Qwerty

Qwerty wrote:

And I'm sure that you might have offended the people concerned.

I don't think the picture is meant to be offensive. Deal or No Deal is also a programme for older viewers so I doubt many young children will come across it. Gary and Aaron have both made comments about the picture, so it doesn't seem that they are offended by it. It is just a bit of fun that's not meant to have caused any harm.

What about the other two people though?!?!

I think you'll find (as Kestral will agree) that DOND is for younger viewers, and there are a lot of registered members on here who are of a young age. It's not exactly great if a younger child (aged 8/9) came on here and saw that picture. They'd probably tell their parents and you might face the consequences, as you give no prior warnings that there may be adult themed/"humoured" content

**Posted:** Wed Mar 22, 2006 12:37 pm **Author:** Qwerty **Post subject:**

The Warlord wrote:

That picture is vile. If I wanted to look at pornography I'd go to porn365.com then at least I'd have a choice over what erotica to browse.

And needless to say I wouldn't look at 4 men in leather trousers.

Especially if they had poorly photoshopped heads.

I don't see myself as a prude, but I know there's children present and material like this could corrupt them, and turn them into dond loving rear end rapists. And all because of this forum.

And I'm sure that's a burden that I'm sure no moderator wants to bare.

Come on, this is harsh and unnecessary. No need for such comments at all.

Qwerty wrote:

Come on, this is harsh and unnecessary. No need for such comments at all.

You mean no need for such vulgar pictures at all?!?!

**Posted:** Wed Mar 22, 2006 12:41 pm **Author:** Qwerty **Post subject:**

Jeremy Kyle's Dad wrote:

Qwerty wrote:

Come on, this is harsh and unnecessary. No need for such comments at all.

You mean no need for such vulgar pictures at all?!?!

No I mean this is harsh things to say, and unecessary.

I'm not being harsh!

I'm simply saying that the picture is of an obscene nature and shouldnt be on a site where children are present!

We're being realistic!

**Joined:** Wed Mar 01, 2006 11:55 am **Warnings:** 0

Qwerty wrote:

Come on, this is harsh and unnecessary. No need for such comments at all.

And there's also no need for poorly photoshopped male nudity.

**Posted:** Wed Mar 22, 2006 12:45 pm **Author:** Qwerty **Post subject:**

Jeremy Kyle's Dad wrote:

I'm not being harsh!

I'm simply saying that the picture is of an obscene nature and shouldnt be on a site where children are present!

We're being realistic!

With all repsect, dicussing pornogrpahic websites and rapists is hardly appropriate.

I havent said anything about rapists etc!!!!!! Who do you think I am?

We're saying that the pictures is morally wrong!

**Posted:** Wed Mar 22, 2006 12:49 pm **Author:** Qwerty **Post subject:**

Jeremy Kyle's Dad wrote:

I havent said anything about rapists etc!!!!!! Who do you think I am?

We're saying that the pictures is morally wrong!

No, but the Warlord has, so it is hardly appropriate for young children to be reading about.

However, I don't want this to escalade into an argument, so I think we should stop now.

**Joined:** Wed Mar 01, 2006 11:55 am **Warnings:** 0

Qwerty wrote:

Jeremy Kyle's Dad wrote:

I havent said anything about rapists etc!!!!!! Who do you think I am?

We're saying that the pictures is morally wrong!

No, but the Warlord has, so it is hardly appropriate for young children to be reading about.

However, I don't want this to escalade into an argument, so I think we should stop now.

It wasn't discussion, I mentioned it in passing.

No. I'm not being difficult but it's a morally wrong picture!

Main DOND Site	Play DOND Games	DOND TV Guide	DOND Stats		FAQs	Hall of Fame
Ebay Watch	DOND Merchandise	Be a Contestant	DOND Amazon Store	DOND Blog	Privacy Policy	Contact Us

First Chippendeals promo photo EXCLUSIVE

Who is online