Deal or No Deal Fansite and Forum: Welcome to DOND, the home of Deal or No Deal fans.

Deal Or No Deal
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 12:29 pm Last visit was: Fri May 01, 2026 12:29 pm


Deal or No Deal is currently on a break.

Deal or No Deal forum index » UK DoND Forums » Deal or No Deal General DiscussionAll times are UTC [ DST ]



 [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message

h2005

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 1:07 am    Author: h2005    Post subject: The £250k on the table - good for the player or not?
Administrator & Global Moderator

Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 3:13 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex
Warnings: 0
Is the £250k being in the contestant's box when they play their game a good thing or not? I'm actually tempted to say it's not a good thing in a way... because whilst it can often guarantee higher offers, a targetist (or a downright cautious player like Beryl) could deal a very low offer with it on the table, and then suffer a long and horrible proveout. I think the big wins in the majority of games have come when the £250k hasn't been on the table.

_________________
Ex-DoND contestant (show #992, 23 March 2009)

Image


Top
 Profile  

Lewis246

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 1:08 am    Author: Lewis246    Post subject:

Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 4:52 pm
Location: Devon
Warnings: 0
Good for the player if they're a targetist, absolutely *beep* for the forum.


Top
 Profile  

James1978

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 1:27 am    Author: James1978    Post subject:

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:47 pm
Location: Darlington, NE England
Warnings: 0
It's good in that a player will not be able to have a complete disaster with it at the table, unless they swap it away for a blue or small red, whihc I really can't see ever happening (not at 2-box for sure).

Even if they deal with 250k and 7 blues at 8-box, only players like 1k Michael or Beryl will most likely deal for anything in 4-figures.

_________________
Image

"22 identical sealed boxes, and no questions except one.....do a poor deal for an easy few thousand or be brave and win a blue!"


Top
 Profile  

StatsMan

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 1:36 am    Author: StatsMan    Post subject:

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 11:55 pm
Warnings: 0
For the sanity of everyone on the forum, I hope it isn't on the table tomorrow!

_________________
Image

Biggest Pilgrim Game Wins:

Marlene - 21 July 2013: £118,000
Gill - 23 March 2014: £75,000
Tony - 24 April 2012: £72,000
Lee - 4 April 2013: £48,000
Tommy & Jen - 26 & 27 Mar 2013 :O - £45,000! :O :O


Top
 Profile  

Lewis246

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 1:39 am    Author: Lewis246    Post subject:

Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 4:52 pm
Location: Devon
Warnings: 0
I'll just add that I'm not saying it's bad for the forum because the contestant deals, it's bad because of the whining at the player dealing and consequently "blowing" the £250,000 that follows!


Top
 Profile  

alexandercbrown

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 1:04 pm    Author: alexandercbrown    Post subject:

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:30 pm
Location: edinburgh
Warnings: 0
Well depends on how they value the 'potential money' available in the game of DOND and what they want out of the game and their own disappointment if they deal. if the are a targetist they might still deal at 30K and be happy conversley the might have 'regrets'. Perhaps only a Noel guilttrip is bad as well.

It coming to the table twice in a row might be good because more gambling might be encouraged.

Statistically the 250K is usually sold for 20-30k and the avergae win with it is about 46.5K.

but other people do have a good point that there can be huge wins without the 250K on the table, Rodney, Graeme etc - only Claudine and Germaine largely benefitted from it.


Top
 Profile  

Aaron Brock

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 2:11 pm    Author: Aaron Brock    Post subject:

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:19 pm
Warnings: 0
Targetist, or a Wakeyist, good either way if you use it in your favour. Don't really give a *beep* about what people say on the forum.

_________________
Eurovision enthusiast and fellow member of #teambat.


Top
 Profile  

rico7

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 2:43 pm    Author: rico7    Post subject:
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 10:36 am
Location: Stratford-upon-avon, Warwickshire
Warnings: 0
It is good if the 250K is on the table providing that there is insurance
of high reds that remains until the final stages. Unless you have people with
gambling tendencies then it is not always a good thing. Many contestants say that they won't deal while the 250K is in play, but the reality is usually very different.


Top
 Profile  

KP

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:05 pm    Author: KP    Post subject:
International Forums Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 8:00 pm
Warnings: 0
Good, if you don't give a monkey's about what Noel et al will tell you assuming you sell it.

Bad, if you're an emotional type.

Would have loved Jeannie and Ingerlise to swap games - Jeannie would have put Noel in his place after the £250k reveal (I've no idea if she'd have turned down the £15k offer or indeed either of the next two, but I'd predict she'd have won £30k) and Ingerlise would surely have Dealt £9,000 for a feel-good OPW!

_________________
Champion of RTaB S6, creator of unorthodox DoND rulesets, and founder member of #teambat.
Creator of the first DoND Live offer to be accepted.
"Why regret what could not be?" (A Heart Full of Love, from Les Misérables)
I introduced utility theory to the forums. Blame me.
In your choices, beware of words leading you astray. Think in a balanced way about potential gains and losses.


Top
 Profile  

lathebault

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:01 pm    Author: lathebault    Post subject:

Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:05 pm
Location: Jersey, Channel Islands
Warnings: 0
Lewis246 wrote:
Good for the player if they're a targetist, absolutely *beep* for the forum.


How the *hell* can it be good for the player if they are a targetist? It means they are going to deal and are always going to make a loss on the box by doing so... agonising losses if they deal below the likes of 50k!

_________________
The ace gambler knows when not to fold.


Top
 Profile  

Lewis246

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:07 pm    Author: Lewis246    Post subject:

Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 4:52 pm
Location: Devon
Warnings: 0
It's good for them because they can win their target!


Top
 Profile  

lathebault

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:10 pm    Author: lathebault    Post subject:

Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:05 pm
Location: Jersey, Channel Islands
Warnings: 0
Lewis246 wrote:
It's good for them because they can win their target!


Maybe so but I would rather not win my target by blowing massive value boxes...

(BTW I wouldn't have a target but I was being general)

_________________
The ace gambler knows when not to fold.


Top
 Profile  

cookie_monster

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:16 pm    Author: cookie_monster    Post subject:
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Chicken Tikka Masalalalalala
Warnings: 0
lathebault wrote:
Lewis246 wrote:
It's good for them because they can win their target!


Maybe so but I would rather not win my target by blowing massive value boxes...


Possibly, but I don't think many targetists would mind as long as they have the money they aimed for won.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  

CrazyChair

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 12:52 am    Author: CrazyChair    Post subject:

Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:34 pm
Warnings: 0
I think having the £250k is bad for the player. It encourages higher offers, so players are likely to deal early and get horrible proveouts. If I was playing, I'd be really gutted if I had it (or it was in my favourite box) and I didn't go for it.


Top
 Profile  

Michael DeVere

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:43 am    Author: Michael DeVere    Post subject:

Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 6:46 pm
Warnings: 0
Never really thought about this actually.

Whilst it should be good for the player, if they end up dealing early on with a modest sum of say £30,000 then no matter what happens, by the time they get to 2-box they are always going to get a massive offer and be told they've done a bad deal, which I guess they have.

Of course if you get a gambler with the £250k in their box and they have a strong game where they will take bigger risks, then depending what their back-up is at 2-box and the Banker's offer we may then see our second QM winner. Unless of course they swap it away.


Top
 Profile  

lathebault

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 6:04 pm    Author: lathebault    Post subject:

Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:05 pm
Location: Jersey, Channel Islands
Warnings: 0
Another loss of £216,000 made on the £250,000 box today... the banker must be a millionaire from Saturday's and this week's games alone...

_________________
The ace gambler knows when not to fold.


Top
 Profile  

Lewis246

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 6:06 pm    Author: Lewis246    Post subject:

Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 4:52 pm
Location: Devon
Warnings: 0
Nicola didn't seem too upset about it though, which is good.


Top
 Profile  

lathebault

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 6:08 pm    Author: lathebault    Post subject:

Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:05 pm
Location: Jersey, Channel Islands
Warnings: 0
Lewis246 wrote:
Nicola didn't seem too upset about it though, which is good.


She would have swapped, or so she said. It's much easier to say that you would swap on a 250k/blue finish before you actually get there... I don't think she would have to be honest if she got to opening the box.

However when she said deal she had box 11 infront of her which means she actually sold that box, hence the £216,000 loss which is a lifechanging amount x3 for me...

_________________
The ace gambler knows when not to fold.


Top
 Profile  

wkd

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 6:13 pm    Author: wkd    Post subject:

Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 6:04 pm
Warnings: 0
Quote:
hence the £216,000 loss


It was a 44k win not any sort of loss. Incidentally 250 minus 44 is 206.


Top
 Profile  

Aaron Brock

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 6:46 pm    Author: Aaron Brock    Post subject:

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:19 pm
Warnings: 0
cookie_monster wrote:
lathebault wrote:
Lewis246 wrote:
It's good for them because they can win their target!


Maybe so but I would rather not win my target by blowing massive value boxes...


Possibly, but I don't think many targetists would mind as long as they have the money they aimed for won.


That's a very snobbish/greedy reason why you'd deal.

_________________
Eurovision enthusiast and fellow member of #teambat.


Top
 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Deal or No Deal forum index » UK DoND Forums » Deal or No Deal General DiscussionAll times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bo, Se, Ya and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  

Deal Or No Deal

[ View who is online ]

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Copyright ©2023 dond.co.uk All rights reserved

www.dond.co.uk is not responsible for the content posted by private individuals on this website. The views expressed herein are solely the opinions of the individuals that produced them and not necessarily the views of the owner, or of the admins, or of the moderators of this website.


Admin Zone Directory