In Semi's game on saturday the banker decided to give him a second chance to win more money, Why?
He had dealt on 14K yet the banker came up with this stupid idea to give him another chance of winning more, how many other contestants would of loved an opportunity of winning more without the thought of going home with nothing.
Why should one contestant get a chance to improve his winnings and all the rest that have been before him don't, does not make sense.
When you have dealt that is the game over, what do you think?


John M

This is the second use of 'The Bankers Gamble' in the UK.

See here for a debate on this topic;

http://www.dond.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.p ... highlight=

I agree with H. Probably because the show has lost its spark lately with 'predictable 15K deals etc'.

I'd like to see more gamblers on the show to redress this rather than just 'twists' but they can't control the luck of the boxes I guess.

It's been different for a year now anyway since 'Andrewgate' in Richard's game.

John, I respect, but I so totaly disagree. The players came on the show, enjoyed the experience and most took some nice money home. Could you ask for anything more?