TOM22 wrote:
James1978 wrote:
TOM22 wrote:
Also some of the comments about Phil earlier in this thread were horrible and uncalled for.
I don't think I said anything too bad
Oh no, it wasn't anything you said, there were some nasty comments about Phils apperance but they were quickly deleted.
NO! They WERE NOT NASTY they were realistic.
What would you call someone who is wider than they are tall?
That was clinical obesity - Sorry if you can't face any form of reality but that what it is.
If more people actually faced the reality of clinical obesity then they wouldn't be in that position in the first place.
If prefer not to go around with my head stuck in the sand.
Because it is covered up, nothing is every done about it and that is an extra strain on the NHS that I am paying for.
Comes to something when all forms of reality get taken out of life - care to fully explain your ever increasing random editing moderator? - What parts of reality are we to not face?
By your refusal to allow reality you are stopping people seeing obesity for what it is unacceptable!
It is this granny moderation on here that unacceptable not correctly calling clinical obesity as unacceptable.
Truly ridiculous! (The moderation on here goes from sublime to the ridiculous!)
< Should be about 10,000 rollyeyes for this latest stupidity.
I think there should be a test of moderation skills before you can start a board as stupidity shown here is way beyond ridiculous!
Let's pretend that someone is not obese, let's remove all traces of reality from our lives.
Whilst I'm paying for clinically obese people to get treatment, I have a say! - Get used to it.
Face reality. This was not "nasty comments about Phils apperance" this is stating the FACT that he is clinically obese. FACT!
Face it!
Anyway, back to reality and away from this latest stupidity above and beyond the last stupidity. (Hard to know where this moderation is going next - no foundation on any reality)
Remember: Stating FACT is not against any law, but then sadly, neither is stupidity.