Charles wrote:
Thats is a fair point, but even Noel agreed with the fact that the offer would not be much higher and I do not think you can call it bad board reading. Maybe meant that in relation to the crash of the nightmare round, the perfect round would not change the offer as much.
We'll have to agree to disagree. My assertion is that on a £75k, £35k, £20k, £15k, £5k board, the offer would be at least £24k - a 60% increase on the last offer. Of course, you don't make decisions based on 1 in 56 chances.
I've got a Masters degree in Mathematics - I can't let inaccuracies like that go unmentioned.
Well it is not just the nightmare round that is included, but all the possibilities of a bad round. I think the point made is that a bad round would lower the offer far more than a good round would raise it, and that is probably true.