I think a sensible deal at 8-box albeit a slightly cautious one (and a 5-box that shows that every so often when you have 4 reds and 1 blue, the blue will be in your box).

I think a sensible deal at 8-box albeit a slightly cautious one (and a 5-box that shows that every so often when you have 4 reds and 1 blue, the blue will be in your box).

Well we had gems around Xmas 09, with Isreal, Bodie, Franny, Pommy and Sanjay

Also we had a young guy around March/April 08 named Bash! (wasn't his real name though, his real name was Yousif)

And about a year ago there was a lady named Boo!

What about Bunney?

Bunney was his surname - his first name was Jonathan. Other unuasual names include Ziggy from last April (his full name was Sigmund or something like that) and in the early days there was a player called Flash.

Who'd have thought we'd start today's game with an offer that was even less statistically generous than any of Katie's?

It was the sort of game where it would have been very easy to adopt a gung-ho attitude - terrible opening round which would have kept at least the first few offers low, through to a relatively stable 8 and 5-box which many would have been inclined to take a chance on, myself possibly included. With that in mind, kudos to Patrick for taking the game and offers seriously and I'm glad his decision was vindicated in the end.

Ziggy's full name was actually Sigismund

There was also a guy named Lofty in May 2006 and a woman shortly after him called Nessie

Anyway as for Pat's game, at least it was a much better result than Katie's ugly game yesterday

Not a bad result, Patrick could have gone one more round yes, but a more than healthy profit on the box,

A show that will be more remembered for what happened in the audience than the game play i suspect (Naked girl, twitter abuse)